Security and Privacy

Best Practices for Researchers Using REDCap

General

A list of research procedures is available from the University of Alberta Research Services Office.

Note that you may also be required to comply with additional requirements if you are collecting data from residents of other jurisdictions.

Online training relating to ethics and privacy is available on the TCPS2 web site at http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/education/tutorial-didacticiel/ 

Storing Identifiers

We strongly discourage storage of identifiers in a study database. However some studies may require that identifiers be stored for data matching or administrative purposes. Where this is the case appropriate approvals and consents must be obtained and additional technical safeguards applied.

Additional information relating to identifiers can be found at the bottom of this page.

CIHR Best Practices

Investigators should be familiar with CIHR best practice guidelines for protecting privacy in health research. These can be summarized as follows:

For more information see the CIHR Best Practices for Protecting Privacy in Health Research, September 2005.

REDCap Surveys

When collecting research data using electronic surveys consent is often implied. However surveys should include an REB approved consent statement indicating that:

Mobile and Third Party Applications

Some systems, notably REDCap, provide mechanisms by which applications can communicate with the central server in order to retrieve or update data. The following general principles apply to such applications:

Data Retention

REDCap is not an archival system. However, study data will remain in the REDCap system until:

If required, and prior to deleting a project from the REDCap system, REDCap support staff will make arrangements with the study team for data to be delivered to the study team for archival.

For privacy reasons it should be noted that deleted studies remain in REDCap for 30 days following deletion. Study data will also remain in system backups for a complete backup cycle. Data pertaining to individual participants is not necessarily deleted when the participant's record is deleted, but may remain in log records. If you are collecting data from jurisdictions where the study participant has a "right to erasure" (for example, European GDPR) you must contact the Privacy Office and the REDCap support team to discuss the request.

Data Access and Other Requests

Certain applicable privacy legislation allows for study participants to request access to their data. Some legislation (such as the European GDPR) may grant participants additional rights. Any such requests must be forwarded to the University’s Privacy Office.

REDCap has certain features that may help you comply with any such request. Contact the support team at redcap@ualberta.ca for additional information.

Obligations Under the Health Information Act

Some projects that use REDCap may be collecting and storing “identifiable healthcare information”. If this is the case then the researcher is obliged to comply with section 54 of the HIA. As employees of the University of Alberta REDCap support staff undertake regular privacy training and are familiar with local privacy legislation. In order to help the researcher meet their obligations REDCap support staff will:

Where a researcher enters into a data disclosure agreement with a Custodian, WCHRI, if requested, will review the agreement and will advise regarding compliance.

Alberta Health Services

The Alberta Health Services standard IPO-2013-0004 also contains recommendations that should be followed by Alberta based clinicians when disclosing health information for research purposes.

GDPR and Extraterritorial Requirements

Researchers collecting data relating to European residents are subject to the ‘extraterritorial’ requirements of GDPR. Other countries such as those in South America may have privacy laws that are based on either GDPR or HIPAA. 

External Researchers

Researchers from institutions other than the University of Alberta may be required to comply with additional local requirements.

Identifiable Information

The Tri Council Policy Statement (TCPS 2) defines identifiable information as follows:

Information that may reasonably be expected to identify an individual, alone or in combination with other available information, is considered identifiable information…

It goes on to further categorize identifiable information.

TCPS Classification

Examples of Identifiers

The US Government’s Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) contains useful examples of data items that constitute identifiers. These may be categorized as either direct or indirect identifiers. This categorization is not intended to be definitive but should be considered as guidance for investigators when considering the context of their own study data.

Direct Identifiers

Indirect Identifiers